Tax experts the annual income of 120 thousand yuan is the high income group rumor (Figure) (video) ppbox

Tax experts: the annual income of 120 thousand yuan is the high income group rumor (Figure) Li kaihong tax experts: "drawing the annual income of over 120 thousand yuan is the high income group is a misreading of" annual income of 120 thousand yuan "touted" annual income of 120 thousand yuan "concept from the actual tax taxpayers in China 10 years of implementation of self declaration system. The media "annual income of 120 thousand yuan is high income" or "the annual salary of 120 thousand yuan to the taxpayer tax" is a deduction and never determine the high income standard in the misrepresentation of low-income and high-income division, international and China are no legal standard determined by the tax law never determined high income standard. "There is a gap between the Chinese people and in different areas of income, high-income groups and low-income groups is a relative concept, not the concept of absolute" according to Xinhua News Agency on the recent view called the annual income of over 120 thousand yuan was set for the high income groups, tax, tax experts several people familiar with a tax reform yesterday responded, this view is wrong, rumor, limit 120 thousand yuan is not high and low income population division. The State Administration of Taxation Science Research Institute director Li Wanfu said, "touted the annual income of 120 thousand yuan" concept from the actual tax taxpayers in China 10 years of implementing self declaration system. According to 2005 the NPC Standing Committee to amend the personal income tax, our country has established the annual income of 120 thousand yuan taxpayer to tax declaration system, only 120 thousand yuan in 2006 to declare the income limit, at that time is not divided into high and low income standards, the future is difficult to become a high income population classification standard. It is a deduction and misrepresentation that the media "120 thousand yuan per year is a high-income person" or "taxpayers who pay 120 thousand yuan per year need to increase taxes". Sun Gang, a researcher at the China Academy of finance, who has been tracking the tax reform for a long time, said that in the division of middle and low income and high income, there is no legal standard in the world and in our country, and there is no standard to determine excessive income in the tax law. "There are gaps in income between different groups and regions in China. High-income groups and low-income groups are relative concepts, not absolute concepts."." Focus on the three major focus of tax reform in recent years, there is a view that "annual income of more than 120 thousand yuan was set as high-income groups, to increase taxes", causing social concern for the tax reform. How much do the annual income belong to the high-income group? What is the direction of tax reform? What are the difficulties that will face? Many experts familiar with the tax reform of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of taxation experts said yesterday that the annual income of 120 thousand yuan is not the demarcation line between high and low income groups, there is no income tax of 120 thousand yuan as a boundary. How much is the focus of the 1 year income? Recently, the State Council issued the "opinions on stimulating the vitality of key groups to promote the income of urban and rural residents" clearly, for skilled personnel, new professional farmers, scientific and technical personnel and other seven groups, launched differentiated income distribution incentive policy. The paper puts forward that we should give full play to the role of tax adjustment of income distribution, and appropriately increase the tax adjustment of high-income earners. What criteria should be used to determine the "high-income earners" mentioned in this policy? Some people believe that the annual income of 120 thousand yuan to society

财税专家:年收入12万元是高收入人群纯属谣言(图)  制图 李开红 财税专家:“年收入12万元以上是高收入人群”是误读 “年所得12万元”来源被热炒的“年所得12万元”概念实际出自我国实施10年的个税纳税人自行申报制度。有关媒体“年所得12万元是高收入者”或“对年薪12万元的纳税人要加税”的说法是一种推演和误传从没确定过高收入标准在中低收入和高收入的划分上,国际上及我国均没有法律确定的标准,税法上也从没有确定过高收入的标准。“我国不同人群和不同地区收入存在差距,高收入群体和低收入群体只是相对概念,不是绝对概念”据新华社电 针对近期有观点称“年收入12万元以上被定为高收入群体,要加税”,多位熟知个税改革的财税专家昨日回应,这一观点是误读,纯属谣言,12万元不是划分高低收入人群的界限。国家税务总局税收科学研究所所长李万甫说,被热炒的“年所得12万元”概念实际出自我国实施10年的个税纳税人自行申报制度。2005年根据全国人大常委会修订个人所得税的意见,我国建立了年所得12万元以上的纳税人自行纳税申报制度,12万元只是2006年起自行申报的收入界限,在当时也不是划分高低收入的标准,今后也难以成为高低收入人群划分的标准。有关媒体“年所得12万元是高收入者”或“对年薪12万元的纳税人要加税”的说法是一种推演和误传。长期跟踪个税改革的中国财政科学研究院研究员孙钢说,在中低收入和高收入的划分上,国际上及我国均没有法律确定的标准,税法上也从没有确定过高收入的标准。“我国不同人群和不同地区收入存在差距,高收入群体和低收入群体只是相对概念,不是绝对概念。”聚焦个税改革三大焦点近期,有观点称“年收入12万元以上被定为高收入群体,要加税”,引发社会对个税改革的关注。到底年收入多少属于高收入群体?个税改革的方向是什么?将面临哪些难点?多位熟知个税改革的财政部和国家税务总局专家昨日表示,年收入12万元并非划分高低收入人群的界限,不存在以年收入12万元为分界加税的情况。焦点1年收入多少属于高收入者?近期,国务院发布的《关于激发重点群体活力带动城乡居民增收的实施意见》明确,对技能人才、新型职业农民、科技人员等七类群体,推出差别化收入分配激励政策。其中提出,要进一步发挥税收调节收入分配的作用,适当加大对高收入者的税收调节力度。这项政策提及的“高收入者”,按什么标准来确定?有舆论认为,年收入12万元以上的属于高收入群体,将是个税改革中重点调节的人群,这意味着年收入超过12万元群体个税将增加。记者采访了解到,“年收入超过12万元属于高收入者”的说法,源于从2006年开始实施的个税申报制度。根据个人所得税申报相关规定,年所得12万元以上的应自行办理纳税申报。业内专家介绍,在个税申报政策制定时,年收入超过12万元的,确实是收入比较高的群体,如申报实施第一年,全国仅有168万人申报。国家税务总局税收科学研究所所长李万甫介绍,当时选择年收入超过12万元的群体进行纳税申报,是为后续个税改革进行试点探索积累经验。年收入12万元,并不涉及高低收入人群划分界限。那么,年收入多少才属于高收入者?中国财政科学研究院研究员孙钢说:“我国不同人群和不同地区收入存在差距,高收入群体和低收入群体只是相对概念,不是绝对概念。”以个税最高税率适用群体为例,我国适用于个税45%以上税率的,为年所得96万元以上群体,是我国去年城镇职工平均收入的15.5倍;美国适用最高39.6%税率的,是年所得40万美元以上群体,约为美国人均收入的9.3倍。焦点2个税改革将怎么改?“当前公众对高收入者标准的关注,背后原因在于个税改革进展慢。”孙钢说。业内专家介绍,个税改革总的原则是增加低收入者收入,扩大中收入者比重,降低中等以下收入者的税收负担,加大对高收入者的税收力度。李万甫等专家介绍,个税改革下一步重点或将是增加家庭扣除项。今后将考虑将一部分教育、房贷、养老等支出,纳入扣除项,使税制政策更加合理。记者采访了解到,由财政部等部门起草的个税改革方案,在今年两会前就已提交国务院。目前,个人所得税属于按月征收。中国人民大学财政金融学院教授朱青介绍,实行综合分类相结合的个税,需要按年申报纳税,所以最好从一个自然年度(纳税年度)开始实行新的个税制度。从这个意义上说,最快也要从2017年7月1日开始实行。焦点3个税改革还面临哪些难点?不少受访专家指出,按综合分类相结合方式实施个税改革后,在调节二次分配、个税实际征管等方面还存在三方面突出难题:个税占比偏低难以发挥调节作用。孙钢等专家表示,目前个税占税收总比重过低,在发挥调节收入、解决分配不公方面的作用仍不突出。大量现金交易难以纳入监管,税收征管能力仍存漏洞。李万甫表示,由于当前仍然存在大量现金交易等情况,因此个人收入和申报的精确确认还难以做到。高收入群体征管仍存漏洞。中山大学财税系教授林江表示,社会上有把个税认为是征收工资税的说法,主要是工薪阶层主要采用企业代扣代缴和税务部门核查的办法,但一些企业高管等高收入群体却可以把个人支出纳入企业成本,规避个税缴纳。专家表示,个税改革很难一步到位。中国财政科学研究院院长刘尚希说,个税改革关键要形成社会最大公约数,坚持“开门立法”,制定大多数人能接受的方案,从而提高公众对税法的遵从度。据新华社相关的主题文章:

« »

Comments closed.